DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

HC confirms death penalty for child’s gruesome murder

  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

Saurabh Malik

Advertisement

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, August 7

Advertisement

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has upheld the death sentence of Sukhjinder Singh, alias Sukha, for the brutal murder of a seven-year-old, with forensic evidence (hair strands discovered in the victim’s clenched fist) playing a crucial role in the conviction.

The matter was placed before the Bench of Justice Sureshwar Thakur and Justice Sudeepti Sharma after “murder reference” was made by the Ferozepur Additional District and Sessions Judge for confirmation of the death sentence. An appeal was also filed by the convict against the judgment and order dated December 11, 2013.

Advertisement

The trial court’s decision was heavily influenced by the forensic evidence. Hair strands found in the deceased’s right fist were compared with hair samples of the convict, revealing a match. The forensic science laboratory’s report confirmed the exhibits (hair strands) as human scalp hair, showing similar characteristics.

The defence, during the court proceedings, argued that the death sentence should be reconsidered, asserting that the case did not fall within the “rarest of the rare” category warranting capital punishment. The defence suggested that life imprisonment would be more appropriate. But the Bench rejected the plea, stating that the arguments did not persuade the judicial conscience.

The Bench upheld the trial judge’s assessment, which noted the severity of the crime and the circumstances surrounding it. The Bench noted that the trial judge, among other things, had observed that it was not a case of simple murder.

The boy, in addition to his one sister, was the only son of his parents. The incident of his kidnapping had sent a shock wave throughout the town and the adjacent areas. The accused-convict was successful in getting ransom from the father. Even then, he killed the minor boy.

The high court concurred with the assessment, emphasising the gravity of the crime and the impact on the community.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts