DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

High court trashes state’s review on Malerkotla courts; Secy apologises

  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

A day after the Punjab and Haryana High Court directed Gurpreet Singh Khaira to appear virtually before the Bench in a case concerning permanent courtrooms and judicial officers’ housing in Malerkotla, the IAS officer and Secretary, Department of Justice, has “expressed apologies for any objectionable material contained in a review application”.

Advertisement

The apology came just over a fortnight after the court directed that the guesthouse and a residence currently occupied by Malerkotla Deputy Commissioner and Senior Superintendent of Police be vacated forthwith. The state, subsequently, filed a review application. The Division Bench of Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sanjiv Berry asserted that a bare reading of extracts of the application showed that it was “bordering on contempt”.

Advertisement

The Bench observed: “After hearing the counsel for the rival parties when the case was taken up, this court is of the considered view that the recalling of judicial order passed on September 12 cannot be done based on an administrative decision taken by the Building Committee on September 2. Accordingly, the review application stands dismissed.”

Advertisement

Fixing the case for further hearing on November 17, the Bench exempted Khaira’s presence “for the time being”. The directions came on a bunch of petitions filed in public interest by the District Bar Association Malerkotla through advocates SS Bahl, Gaurav Vir Singh Behl, Raageshwari Sharma and Jugraj Singh Chauhan.

The court asserted that the sole ground apparently taken by Punjab was the building committee resolution passed on September 2, which accepted the state’s proposal to build permanent houses for district and sessions judges in one year.

Advertisement

The Bench added that the building committee resolution was taken into account by the court while passing the order on September 12. “Therefore, the state or its functionary have no business to go behind the judicial order darted September 12”.

The Bench had earlier made it clear that the state’s repeated failure to provide permanent courtrooms and judicial officers’ housing compelled the court to intervene. “Looking at the large number of cases pending in Malerkotla and the state repeatedly failing to provide any infrastructure, this court is compelled to direct that the guesthouse presently occupied by the Deputy Commissioner and the other house occupied by the Senior Superintendent of Police, be vacated forthwith and allotment letters issued in favour of the District & Sessions Judge, for official residence/courtroom (if viable) qua District & Sessions Judge,” the Bench asserted.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts