DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Higher edu benefits apply from degree date, not application: HC

  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
Advertisement

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has made it clear that the eligibility for additional increments under an incentive scheme is required to be determined from the date an employee acquires higher qualification and not from the date he submits the application for the benefit.

Advertisement

‘Delay no bar’

A mere delay in the submission of the application by the employee ought not to result in the forfeiture of the benefit. Such an interpretation would not align with the scheme’s intent or ensure fairness in its implementation.

Justice Vinod S Bhardwaj, Punjab and Haryana high court

Justice Vinod S Bhardwaj also made it clear that disciplinary or vigilance proceedings initiated after the date of acquiring the qualification could not disentitle the employee from receiving the benefit even if the application was submitted later.

The ruling came on a petition filed against the Food Corporation of India and other respondents by now-retired manager (quality control) for quashing an order issued in August 2019 rejecting his claim for additional increments on acquiring higher qualification.

Advertisement

The respondents’ stand in the matter was that an employee involved in a vigilance case or under suspension would not be entitled to additional increment until exonerated. Justice Bhardwaj ruled a narrow construction that pegged eligibility to the date of application defeated the scheme’s purpose to incentivise professional upskilling.

Elaborating, Justice Bhardwaj asserted the respondents’ submission that the petitioner was ineligible because a vigilance inquiry was pending on the date of application submission arose from a narrow and isolated reading of a clause to hold “as if the benefit accrues only from the date of application”.

Advertisement

The Bench ruled that the scheme’s harmonious and purposive construction made it clear that eligibility was required to be assessed from the date the employee became entitled to the benefit, which was the date of acquiring higher qualification.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts