Paddy not native crop of Punjab, its cultivation must be phased out: Supreme Court

Tribune News Service

Satya Prakash

New Delhi, November 7

Noting that paddy is not a native crop of Punjab, the Supreme Court on Tuesday said its cultivation must be phased out and replaced by non-water-guzzling crops.

During hearing on air pollution in Delhi-NCR caused by stubble burning, a Bench led by Justice SK Kaul agreed with Punjab Advocate General Gurminder Singh’s suggestion that paddy cultivation must be replaced by millets.

It also agreed with Singh’s submission that the Centre should consider giving Minimum Support Price (MSP) for other crops rather than for paddy.

“Punjab is seeing a scenario where the growth of paddy is causing the water table to decline and that too drastically. A number of wells have been stated to have gone beyond redemption. It is his (AG’s) suggestion and we believe it, that paddy cultivation must be phased out to be substituted with other crops and the Central Government should explore the aspect of giving minimum support price for the alternative crops that are given for paddy,” it said.

The Bench – which also included Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia --directed the Punjab governmentto strictly implement the Punjab Preservation of Subsoil Water Act 2009.

It sought to emphasise that a switchover to alternative crops other than paddy—which was not a native crop of Punjab—was required so as to ensure that the problem of stubble burning does not recur.

“The switchover can occur only if MSP is not given to paddy and is given to other crops. In this context, the Court noted that the Central Government is, in any case, pursuing a policy to encourage growing traditional crops,” the top court said.

“A serious consideration is required whether this kind of paddy should at all be grown and certainly, we believe, this problem is persistent with the particular paddy which is grown and the time period when it is grown,” it noted.

Pointing out that 15 years back, this problem did not exist because this particular cropping was not there, the Bench said, “We want all the stakeholders to act promptly in respect of the aforesaid aspects.

The Bench also expressed concern over the misuse MSP for paddy, after the Advocate General said paddy grown in neighbouring states was being illegally smuggled into Punjab to claim MSP.

About The Author

Tribune News Service

The Tribune News Service brings you the latest news, analysis and insights from the region, India and around the world. Follow the Tribune News Service for a wide-ranging coverage of events as they unfold, with perspective and clarity.

Join Whatsapp Channel of The Tribune for latest updates.

#Environment #Farm Fires #Pollution #Stubble Burning #Supreme Court