DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Punjab and Haryana High Court reads down amended sportsmen recruitment rules

The court was hearing petitions challenging the 2020 amendment to the Punjab Recruitment of Sportsmen Rules, 1988
  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
The Division Bench of Justice Sureshwar Thakur and Justice Sudeepti Sharma held that the amended rule could not be applied to exclude athletes who met the criteria under the original rules. Tribune file
Advertisement

Tribune News Service

Advertisement

Chandigarh, August 24

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has read down a provision in the Punjab Recruitment of Sportsmen (First Amendment) Rules, 2020, which had sought to restrict the eligibility of sportsmen for government jobs under the sports quota.

Advertisement

The Division Bench of Justice Sureshwar Thakur and Justice Sudeepti Sharma held that the amended rule could not be applied to exclude athletes who met the criteria under the original rules.

The court was hearing petitions filed by Divraj Singh, Manveer Singh, and Karandeep Singh Dhindsa. They had, among other things, challenged the 2020 amendment to the Punjab Recruitment of Sportsmen Rules, 1988.

Advertisement

The amendment restricted eligibility for Group A and B posts to those who had won medals in senior national championships or national games, thereby disqualifying athletes who had achieved success in junior categories or other recognized events.

Justice Thakur, delivering the judgment, observed: “The State, while possessing the authority to amend the recruitment rules, must exercise this power in a manner that is fair and just. The exclusion of sportsmen who have achieved success in recognized events but do not meet the stricter criteria introduced by the 2020 amendment is arbitrary and unjust.”

The Bench further noted, “The amendment to Rule 2(d)(a)(ii) of the 1988 Rules, which introduces the term 'senior' in relation to national championships, cannot retrospectively disqualify individuals who were eligible under the original rules. The legitimate expectations of those who qualified under the earlier criteria must be protected.”

In reading down the amended rule, the court stated: “The rule as amended cannot be applied to negate the eligibility of those who, under the 1988 Rules, were deemed to be sportsmen. The introduction of the term 'Senior' must be understood as an additional criterion for future applicants, not as a means to disqualify those who were already eligible.”

The court ruled the petitioners’ applications would be considered under the pre-amendment criteria, and the amended rule would not be applied to disqualify them. The direction would ensure that the amendment did not operate retrospectively to the detriment of individuals who had a legitimate expectation of eligibility under the previous rules.

The Bench concluded by directing the state to “reconsider the applications of the petitioners and similarly situated individuals under the criteria set forth in the Punjab Recruitment of Sportsmen Rules, 1988, without reference to the amendments introduced in 2020.”

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts