Punjab gets approval to procure ‘V-Kavach’ jammers for jails
The Punjab Government received the approval to proceed with the installation of ‘V-Kavach’ jammers in jails across the state. The Ministry of Home Affairs confirmed that prior approval for the project had already been granted in August and September, eliminating the need for further clearance.
The development came to light during a resumed hearing before the Bench of Justice Anupinder Singh Grewal and Justice Lapita Banerji. Additional Solicitor-General of India Satya Pal Jain informed the court that the Ministry of Home Affairs had conveyed the prior approval through letters dated August 23 and September 26, allowing the Punjab government to proceed with the procurement and installation of the jammers.
The ‘V-Kavach’ jammers are designed to prevent the misuse of mobile phones in jails and are expected to enhance security by curbing illegal activities. The jammers are capable of anti-IED, anti-drone, and anti-cellular interference, creating an electromagnetic barrier that blocks communication signals, including those used by bombs.
Meanwhile, the special investigation team (SIT), led by Special Director-General of Police Prabodh Kumar, submitted an affidavit and status report in a sealed cover. The court was informed that some progress had been made in the investigation, but additional information from various state departments was still being compiled and analysed. The court reviewed the report before ordering it to be resealed.
The case stems from the controversial in-custody interview of criminal Lawrence Bishnoi, which raised concerns about the glorification of crime. In a previous hearing, the court had noted that seven Punjab Police officers had been suspended, and departmental proceedings were initiated. However, the Bench expressed concern that no action had been taken against senior officers involved in facilitating the interview. “This court, by order dated August 7, had specifically directed that action be taken against the senior officers, and that lower-level officers should not be made scapegoats. No action appears to have been taken against the senior officers of the district,” the Bench remarked.
The court continues to monitor the case and is awaiting further updates from the investigation.
