DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
Add Tribune As Your Trusted Source
search-icon-img
search-icon-img
Advertisement

Punjab government free to decide on merger of dists, rules HC

Ruled the formation or merging of subdivisions and districts falls under the exclusive policy domain of the state

  • fb
  • twitter
  • whatsapp
  • whatsapp
featured-img featured-img
The Bench noted that the PIL raised concerns over alleged lack of consultation, feasibility study, or approval regarding the merger. File
Advertisement

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) challenging the state government’s proposal to merge Hoshiarpur’s Garhshankar subdivision with the proposed Anandpur Sahib district.

Advertisement

A Bench comprising Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sanjiv Berry ruled the formation or merging of subdivisions and districts falls under the exclusive policy domain of the state, where judicial interference is unwarranted unless the decision shocks the conscience of a common man.

Advertisement

The Bench noted that the PIL raised concerns over alleged lack of consultation, feasibility study, or approval regarding the merger. However, no grounds were found to warrant judicial intervention, especially since the merger has not yet been officially notified.

Advertisement

The court said, “No such ground is made out and more so, the merging of subdivision Garhshankar with the proposed Anandpur Sahib district has not yet been notified. Accordingly, for the time being, this petition stands dismissed.”

Opposition parties and stakeholders continue to oppose the proposed creation of Anandpur Sahib as Punjab’s 24th district, which would include parts of Rupnagar and the Garhshankar subdivision of Hoshiarpur.

Advertisement

The Bar Association of Garhshankar and residents of the Garhshankar Assembly constituency protested the merger, emphasising that the subdivision was an integral part of Hoshiarpur district. The petitioner argued that historical, administrative, economic and public sentiment factors warrant keeping Garhshankar within Hoshiarpur.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts