TrendingVideosIndia
Opinions | CommentEditorialsThe MiddleLetters to the EditorReflections
UPSC | Exam ScheduleExam Mentor
State | Himachal PradeshPunjabJammu & KashmirHaryanaChhattisgarhMadhya PradeshRajasthanUttarakhandUttar Pradesh
City | ChandigarhAmritsarJalandharLudhianaDelhiPatialaBathindaShaharnama
World | ChinaUnited StatesPakistan
Diaspora
Features | The Tribune ScienceTime CapsuleSpectrumIn-DepthTravelFood
Business | My MoneyAutoZone
News Columns | Straight DriveCanada CallingLondon LetterKashmir AngleJammu JournalInside the CapitalHimachal CallingHill View
Don't Miss
Advertisement

Drug case: State opposes Bikram Majithia’s plea

Unlock Exclusive Insights with The Tribune Premium

Take your experience further with Premium access. Thought-provoking Opinions, Expert Analysis, In-depth Insights and other Member Only Benefits
Yearly Premium ₹999 ₹349/Year
Yearly Premium $49 $24.99/Year
Advertisement
Advertisement

Tribune News Service

Advertisement

Chandigarh, November 18

A day after senior Akali leader and MLA Bikram Singh Majithia sought directions for being made party to the ongoing drugs menace case after alleging attempts by his political opponents to target him, the state of Punjab today opposed the plea.

Delay tactics: AAP

Advertisement

State AAP chief Bhagwant Mann termed the petition filed by Akali leader Bikram Singh Majithia in the multi-crore drug case as an attempt to delay the matter ahead of the Assembly elections

As the matter came up for resumed hearing before the Bench of Justice Augustine George Masih and Justice Sandeep Moudgil, former Advocate General APS Deol opened the arguments and told the court senior advocate Dushyant Dave would be representing the state in the matter.

Seeking the rejection of his plea, the state told the Bench the matter was pending in the HC since 2013, but Majithia wanted to become a party now when the case was heading towards a conclusion. As such, his application was required to be dismissed.

Appearing on Majithia’s behalf, senior counsel RS Cheema with Arshdeep Singh Cheema told the court he should be given an opportunity to present his side.

The state, during the course of hearing, demanded the opening of sealed reports in the matter for enabling the government to take further action on them. The Bench has now fixed the case for December 6 for further hearing in the matter.

Advertisement
Show comments
Advertisement