Time-barred appeals in UAPA cases not maintainable: HC

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has made it clear that an appeal filed by an accused after inordinate delay in matters involving offences under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) cannot be entertained.

Advertisement

The Division Bench of Justice Sureshwar Thakur and Justice Kuldeep Tiwari asserted in its detailed order that the appeal filed by the accused against a Special Judge’s order declining bail in a case involving offences under the provisions of the UAPA would not be maintainable, if delayed beyond the statutory time limit.

The Bench also referred to its earlier judgment in the case of “Navish Kumar, alias Navi, versus the State of Punjab” to say that appeals filed under Section 21 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, beyond the statutory time limit were legally untenable.

The court ruled that judicial consistency was vital to avoid conflicting rulings and maintain legal discipline. It added the reason for its observation stemmed from the fact the court in Navish Kumar’s case had held that any time-barred appeal filed by an accused against a declining order passed by the Special Judge, concerning an application involving offences under the UAPA, would not be maintainable.

The ruling came in a case where the court had initially condoned a delay of 706 days in filing the appeal, but the Bench later exercised its suo motu powers to review and set aside that condonation order.