DT
PT
Subscribe To Print Edition About The Tribune Code Of Ethics Download App Advertise with us Classifieds
search-icon-img
search-icon-img

THOUGHT FOR THE DAY

What we need in medical schools is not to teach empathy, as much as to preserve it. — Abraham Verghese

Advertisement

Editorials View More right-arow

Columnists View Moreright-arow

Advertisement

Comment View More right-arow

Advertisement

Letters to the Editor View More right-arow

  • The MiG-21's service ended despite its 'flying coffin' reputation. Punjab plans tree protection legislation with potential imprisonment. The Iran-Israel shadow war threatens regional stability, impacting India's energy security. A stalking case accused was appointed as Assistant Advocate General, which is considered insensitive. Handwritten writing is nostalgically remembered.

  • Dhankhar's actions as VP diminished impartiality due to excessive loyalty. His resignation creates an opportunity for the Opposition to challenge the BJP if united. The swift acceptance of his resignation is concerning given his past. The NPT's principles are jeopardized by current conflicts. Gaza's humanitarian crisis requires governmental action. Punjab's land pooling policy should start as a pilot project.

  • The proposed anti-sacrilege bill in Punjab appears politically motivated, potentially to regain rural support lost due to farmer protests. India-Nepal border disputes should be resolved through existing mechanisms. Cybercrime requires international cooperation and awareness campaigns. Job seekers should use verified platforms and be cautious of instant money offers. The Mumbai bombings' acquittals highlight justice system flaws.

  • Meghalaya's healthcare is improving, but education quality lags. Tesla's India entry offers tax revenue for the government. China's Brahmaputra dam raises environmental and strategic concerns for India and Bangladesh. Parliament must have meaningful debates. Registering Kanwariyas could prevent violence during the yatra.

  • Freedom of speech is crucial, but must be responsible to protect dignity and harmony. Dissent and lawful expression should be protected. The 'hard right's' influence hinders societal change. US hypocrisy is evident in its handling of terrorists and Pakistan. Sanctions on Russian oil have unintended consequences and highlight NATO's double standards.

  • India should maintain strategic alliances based on mutual interests and strengthen its military. Drone technology requires collaborative innovation. Effective anti-drone systems and robust supply chains are crucial for national security. Rivers are being polluted due to negligence. Political leaders need to demonstrate more decorum. The tribute to Flying Officer Nirmal Jit Singh Sekhon is a fitting recognition of his bravery.

  • India needs self-reliance in rare earth mineral production, crucial for industrial growth and securing supply chains, while also exploring domestic resources. The misuse of state machinery to suppress dissent undermines India's democracy. Preserving cultural heritage is vital, and authorities should prioritize the safety of online transactions. Modern warfare demands technological advancements in weaponry, and support for traditional artisans should be encouraged.

  • Politicians imposing homogeneity through language will fracture society. Sacrilege laws risk misuse and contradict secularism. AI should support, not replace, human education. A student's suicide highlights systemic failure and inaction towards harassment. Voter list verification is necessary to address illegal immigration and its impact on security and the economy.

This day that year View More right-arow

  • The Senior Subordinate Judge ruled in favor of the defendant in the Bande Mataram libel suit, despite a technical win for the plaintiff. The judge largely validated the paper's claims, specifically confirming prisoner maltreatment in Multan jail through substantial witness testimonies regarding punishments like 'kan parade' and 'Gidar Kut.'

  • Gandhi responded to Lord Birkenhead's speech by liberating the Swaraj party from the yarn franchise. Recognizing the need to bolster their influence, he aims to remove Congress restrictions and offer its resources to the party for political action.

  • The authors believe a separate Charkha organization within the Congress is ideal. This structure would benefit both the Charkha program and the Congress by allowing each to focus on its distinct goals. They suggest the Congress delegate authority and funds to this new Charkha-focused entity.

  • Lord Birkenhead saw little criticism of the government's India policy due to opposition support. He then issued a veiled threat, stating Britain's resolve to ensure the effectiveness of any Indian constitution. This warning was unnecessary, as Indians understood Britain's position.

  • Srinivasa Sastri finds a silver lining in Lord Birkenhead's speech, despite widespread criticism. He dismisses the hope others find in the call for India to create a constitution, but focuses on the possibility of a Royal Commission before 1929 if certain conditions are met. The author disagrees with Sastri's optimism.

  • In 1924-25, India's economy improved due to European financial recovery and good rainfall. Exports rose to Rs 385 crore, outpacing imports valued at Rs 243 crore. Increased exports, particularly of cotton, jute, and grains, fueled an influx of gold and silver, stabilizing exchange rates.

  • The Lahore Municipal Committee is likely corrupt. Responding to government inquiries, the committee denied corruption charges and appointed internal officials to investigate. The officials' reports, particularly the Secretary's, revealed instances of inaction regarding alleged corruption. The press was denied access to the reports.

  • Lord Birkenhead states constitutional revision hinges on Indian leaders' cooperation. He praises Madras for its successful cooperation. Despite this, and his own assertion that Madras is fit for advancement, Birkenhead offers no revision in Madras, thus seemingly contradicting his own criteria.

  • Lord Birkenhead's speech, misinterpreted as targeting only Swarajists and Non-cooperators, actually challenged all Indian political groups by denying India's nationhood. His offer to revise the constitution and consider an agreed-upon Indian constitution was vague and unsatisfactory, as pointed out by Sir Tej Bahadur Sapru.

tlbr_img1 Classifieds tlbr_img2 Videos tlbr_img3 Premium tlbr_img4 E-Paper tlbr_img5 Shorts