AMRITSAR: NOT LIVING UP TO THE EXPECTATIONS!
Neha Saini
Tribune News Service
Amritsar, March 5
Amritsar’s ranking in the Ease of Living Index assessment, a citizen perception survey 2020 released by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs blasted through all the efforts that the MC had been putting in, or claiming to, for the past one year for a better infrastructure. In the list of 49 cities assessed in the category of ‘population more than a million’, Amritsar ranked 45th.
Jalandhar declared safest city in Punjab
Advertisement
Besides the Ease of Index rank, the MC Performance survey was also done for the first time for each city and Amritsar’s was slightly better at 38.
Gunbir Singh, president, Dilbir Foundation, that has been actively engaged in collaborating with the MC on developmental projects, said, “As a city that hosts an average 40 million visitors per annum, it deserves attention, requisite funding and execution of its projects. Let this bottom listing be a revelation and a starting point for a sea change that cities such as Indore and Surat have witnessed after hitting nadir. Besides cracking the test of rankings, there is potential to excel for the holy city in all spheres whether it is economic, infrastructural, ecology or business and services. A wholehearted approach by the city from civic administration to responsible citizenship is the key.
Mandeep Singh, a retired railway employee and one of the participants in the citizen survey last year, too, pushed for reforms in planning and implementation of developmental works. “The bottom line is that key areas like sanitation, traffic management and encroachments need to be reviewed. Citizens also need to participate in improving the living standards and the MC must find solution to increase its revenue so that more is pumped into developmental works.”
Less than 1% citizens participated in the survey
The citizen responses for the Ease of Living assessment were conducted in February last year. Despite the MC’s best efforts, only 6,300 residents submitted their feedback for the Ease of Living Index assessment, a Citizen Perception Survey. It was less than 1 per cent of the total population of the city. Lower citizen engagement meant that scope for final assessment remained limited.