CAT single member’s order not sustainable, Chandigarh tells High Court : The Tribune India

Join Whatsapp Channel

CAT single member’s order not sustainable, Chandigarh tells High Court

CAT single member’s order not sustainable, Chandigarh tells High Court


Saurabh Malik
Tribune News Service
Chandigarh, March 12

An order passed by a single member of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) is not sustainable. This was told to the Punjab and Haryana High Court by the Chandigarh Administration during the hearing of a petition. Its senior standing counsel informed a Division Bench of the High Court that a notification issued more than four years ago made it clear that such an order was without jurisdiction.

The Bench of Justice Rajan Gupta and Justice Meenakshi I. Mehta was hearing the petition filed by the UT Administration and other petitioners against Amit Sharma

and other respondents. As the service matter came up for preliminary hearing before the Bench on a previous date of hearing, the Judges asked the UT senior standing counsel, Pankaj Jain, to explain whether the order under challenge passed by a single member of the Tribunal was sustainable. Jain, under the circumstances, sought some time to examine the issue. Taking a note of his submission, the matter was adjourned for further hearing.

As the case came up for resumed hearing, Jain produced the notification dated September 8, 2016, which was taken on record by the Bench. Referring to the notification, Jain told the Bench that a bare perusal of the document made it clear that the order passed by the single member of the Tribunal would be coram non judice.

The Latin legal maxim means “not before a judge” and is basically used to indicate a proceeding before a court lacking the authority to hear and decide the case in question.

Taking a note of the submissions, the Bench asserted: “In view of the above, we deem it fit to relegate the petitioners to the same authority for moving an appropriate application to consider its plea”. The Bench, with the direction, disposed of the matter.

The case is significant as it means orders passed by a single member of the Tribunal would be considered as lacking jurisdiction in view of the notification.


Top News

India summons Canadian diplomat over raising of pro-Khalistan slogans at event attended by PM Justin Trudeau

India summons Canadian deputy envoy over pro-Khalistan slogans at event attended by PM Justin Trudeau

Ministry of External Affairs describes the raising of slogan...

Uttarakhand suspends licences of 14 products made by Ramdev's pharmaceutical companies

Uttarakhand suspends licences of 14 products made by Ramdev's pharmaceutical companies

The list of 14 products whose licences were suspended includ...

Supreme Court recalls order for termination of 30-week pregnancy of 14-year-old rape survivor

Supreme Court recalls order for termination of 30-week pregnancy of 14-year-old rape survivor

Bench led by CJI Chandrachud withdraws its April 22 order af...

Telangana CM Revanth Reddy summoned by Delhi Police to join probe in Amit Shah’s doctored video case

Amit Shah's 'doctored' video: Delhi Police summon Telangana CM Revanth Reddy, one arrested in Assam

Revanth Reddy says he will not be afraid about notice over p...

Supreme Court stays CBI probe into West Bengal government officials' role in teacher recruitment scam

Supreme Court stays CBI probe into West Bengal Government officials' role in teacher recruitment scam

Top court, however, refuses to stay High Court order cancell...


Cities

View All