Tribune News Service
Chandigarh, November 6
The sub-group of the Chandigarh Heritage Conservation Committee has disapproved of the revised proposal for a ground plus three-level building with a structural foundation strength of a ground plus four-level building under the expansion plan of the Punjab and Haryana High Court on a 3,21,000 sq ft area.
Sources said instead of the revised proposal for a multi-storeyed building, the sub-group had recommended a low-rise building as per the first plan prepared by the architect, Satnam Namita and Associates, earlier.
The sub-group has submitted its recommendations to the Chandigarh Heritage Conservation Committee, which will take the final decision. Members of the group visited the site last week to give their recommendations on two issues — revised expansion plan of the High Court and the construction of the 7-foot-high security wall. The members recommended that the security wall may be allowed where it is necessary for security reasons.
The sub-group found that the revised plan for the expansion of the High Court was against the master plan and the management plan submitted before UNESCO for the world heritage status to the Capitol Complex.
The sub-group recommended that the security concerns of the Punjab and Haryana High Court would be addressed without compromising on the heritage status of the Capitol Complex, declared a world heritage site by UNESCO in 2016. The Capitol Complex comprises the iconic buildings of the High Court, Assemblies and the Secretariat.
While the security committee of the Punjab and Haryana High Court had directed the Chandigarh Administration to construct a high security boundary wall, not less than 7 ft in height, with a concertina coil covering the entire boundary of the High Court premises, the committee building of the High Court had directed to prepare a detailed project report (DPR) for a ground plus three-level building with a structural foundation strength of a ground plus four-level building, rejecting the earlier low-rise building plan prepared by Satnam Namita and Associates.
The building committee of the High Court had rejected the expansion plan on 2,66,430 sq ft prepared by the architect and had asked the architect to prepare an expansion plan on 3,21,000 sq ft with the structural strength to bear the load of a ground plus four-level building to cater to the present as well as future requirement.
The sources said the sub-group members found that the multi-storeyed building was against the master plan of the UT submitted to the Punjab and Haryana High Court and approved by the Government of India. Besides, any further construction may put the world heritage status in danger. Conservation architect Abha Narain Lambha, appointed by the Administration, had raised an objection to the multi-storeyed building on the HC premises. She said any further development could jeopardise the world heritage status of the Capitol Complex.
The sources said the members had emphasised the need for getting environment clearances for the expansion plan as the High Court area falls in an eco-sensitive zone notified by the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change in 2017. Any construction in an eco-sensitive zone requires mandatory clearance. The Supreme Court yesterday scrapped the Tata Camelot high-rise township project as it falls in the eco-sensitive zone.
About the expansion plan
- Initially, a holistic development plan was prepared for “ground plus two levels” over 2.90 lakh sq ft for setting up, among other things, judicial and general branches, courtrooms, lawyers’ chambers and a parking for 3,500 to 4,000 four-wheelers. The area was enhanced to 3.21 lakh sq ft for “ground plus three levels” in accordance with the directions issued by the High Court building committee. But the area was reduced to “ground plus one level” over 2.66 lakh sq ft following recommendations by the “conservation architect”.
- The reduction, apparently, did not find favour with the authorities concerned and the area was resolved to be enhanced to at least 3.21 lakh sq ft during the building committee meeting held on May 16. The matter again came up for consideration during the meeting held on October 3. A private consultant appointed by UT Chief Engineer presented a development plan with provision for 3.45 lakh sq ft area. After discussing the matter at length, the committee approved the plan “with further directions that the buildings shall be constructed “ground plus three levels” with a structural foundation strength of ground plus four so as to cater to the future requirements of the High Court for expansion”.
- The committee made it clear that it was of the considered opinion that the proposal for the “extended building of this court”, based on functional requirement of the litigants and the court, would have “precedence over the non-statutory norms and regulations of the heritage committee”.
Decision on reopening of school, colleges in July | No restr...
Revised timings for night curfew will be from 9 pm to 5 am
The crew has been quarantined
India and China are engaged in the standoff for over three w...
Proceedings were held up due to the nationwide lockdown