No authority to implement PNDT Act, ‘top officers’ in dock : The Tribune India

No authority to implement PNDT Act, ‘top officers’ in dock

CHANDIGARH: Taking cognisance of the 15-year delay by Punjab in constituting a multi-member ‘Appropriate Authority’ for the implementation of Act against sex determination, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has placed its “top officers” in the dock.



Saurabh Malik

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, June 3

Taking cognisance of the 15-year delay by Punjab in constituting a multi-member ‘Appropriate Authority’ for the implementation of Act against sex determination, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has placed its “top officers” in the dock.

It has asked the state to place on record the names of the “highest officers” responsible for the delay from September 2003 till May this year.

The direction by the Bench of Justice AB Chaudhari and Justice BS Walia came on a petition filed by

Dr Zoni Jain and another petitioner against the state and other respondents.

They had challenged the prosecution filed against them before a Judicial Magistrate in Ludhiana under the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994.

The Bench observed that the PNDT Act was brought into force from September 1994, but one of the key provisions was amended with effect from February 14, 2003. It said, among the other things, the state government would appoint one or more appropriate authorities for the whole, or part of the state, for “the purposes of this Act having regard to the intensity of the problem of pre-natal sex determination leading to female foeticide”.

The Bench added a duty, as such, was cast on the state to constitute a multi-member ‘Appropriate Authority’ within three months of the implementation of the Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Amendment Act, 2002. The Bench added that the mandate was crystal clear. “As a matter of fact, there could be no scope to interpret that there could be only one member ‘Appropriate Authority’ namely Civil Surgeon…,” the Bench added.

Referring to the case of “Help Welfare Group Society versus State of Haryana and others”, the Bench ruled that the High Court in the matter held that the ‘Appropriate Authority’ would be multi-member, and not single-member. The Bench added that the judgment was delivered on September 18, 2013. As such, the state was bound to create a multi-member authority within three months from February 14, 2003.

Top News

Bihar Police arrest 27 in Nalanda, 18 in Sasaram in connection with Ram Navami violence

Bihar Police arrest 27 in Nalanda, 18 in Sasaram in connection with Ram Navami violence

Situation in Sasaram and Biharsharif normal, say police

Amit Shah’s visit to Sashastra Seema Bal’s Patna Frontier cancelled

Amit Shah's visit to Sashastra Seema Bal's Patna Frontier cancelled

Notably, Shah’s tour of Sasaram in Rohtas district has been ...

Defamation case: Rahul Gandhi likely to move court against conviction on Monday

Defamation case: Rahul Gandhi likely to move court against conviction on Monday

Gandhi was convicted on March 23 in the defamation case for ...

Indian cricket legend Salim Durani dies at 88 in Gujarat’s Jamnagar

Indian cricket legend Salim Durani dies at 88; tributes pour in

The Kabul-born Durani played 29 Tests for India

Identification of Indian migrant family found dead near Canada-US border pending: Officials

Identification of Indian migrant family found dead near Canada-US border pending: Officials

Bodies of eight persons were found on Friday in a marsh on t...


Cities

View All