Bombay HC decriminalises possession of beef : The Tribune India

Join Whatsapp Channel

Bombay HC decriminalises possession of beef

MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court on Friday ruled that possession of beef slaughtered outside Maharashtra would not be a criminal offence but it upheld the government''s decision to ban the slaughter of bullocks in the state.

Bombay HC decriminalises possession of beef


Mumbai, May 6

The Bombay High Court on Friday ruled that possession of beef slaughtered outside Maharashtra would not be a criminal offence but it upheld the government's decision to ban the slaughter of bullocks in the state.

The ruling by a Division Bench comprising Justice AS Oka and Justice SC Gupte came on a bunch of petitions challenging the provisions in the Maharashtra Animal Preservation (Amendment) Act, 2015,which stipulated penal action even for possession of beef brought from outside the state.

Accordingly, while slaughter of bullocks would not be permitted, the court has permitted the import and consumption of beef from other states to Maharashtra.

The President had granted assent to the Maharashtra Animal Preservation (Amendment) Act, which prohibited slaughter of bulls and bullocks as well as possession and consumption of their meat in the state.

The Act stipulated a five-year jail term and Rs.10,000 fine for slaughter of bulls or bullocks and one-year imprisonment and Rs.2,000 fine for possession of its meat.

Meanwhile, Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis today said the Maharashtra government, if required, will approach the Supreme Court against the high court’s decision of striking down of “unconstitutional Sections” of Maharashtra Animals Preservation (Amendment) Act.

“The high court has affirmed that our law is constitutional and it has not targeted any religion, caste or creed. I am happy that our stand is vindicated by the court,” Fadnavis told reporters here.

“However, there are two provisions of the law that have been struck down by the high court. We will consult our lawyers and if necessary, will approach the Supreme Court against this. Other than these two provisions, the court has found no fault with the law,” he added. — Agencies

Top News

Salman Khan house firing case: Accused attempts suicide in lock-up, dies at hospital in Mumbai

Salman Khan house firing case: Accused attempts suicide in lock-up, dies at hospital in Mumbai

Deceased was accused of supplying weapons to shooters who op...

2 Delhi schools evacuated after they receive bomb threat

At least 100 schools receive bomb threats in Delhi NCR; found nothing after checks, say police

The schools are evacuated after local police are informed ab...

Plea in Supreme seeking expert panel to examine possible side effects, risk factors of Covishield vaccine

PIL in Supreme Court seeks directions to study possible side effects of Astrazeneca's Covishield vaccine

Astrazeneca has admitted before a court in UK that Covishiel...

Sidhu Moosewala murder case: Court frames charges against Lawrence Bishnoi, 26 others

Sidhu Moosewala murder case: Court frames charges against jailed gangster Lawrence Bishnoi, 26 others

Canada-based gangster Goldy Brar, prime accused in the case,...


Cities

View All