Wednesday, August 15, 2018
facebook

google plus
FLASH
  • HAPPY INDEPENDENCE DAY TO OUR READERS
Nation

Posted at: Jan 24, 2018, 7:42 PM; last updated: Jan 24, 2018, 7:42 PM (IST)

Bombay HC quashes order gagging media in Sohrabuddin case trial

Bombay HC quashes order gagging media in Sohrabuddin case trial
''The special CBI court overreached its powers in issuing the order.''

Mumbai, January 24

The Bombay High Court on Wednesday quashed and set aside the trial court's order prohibiting journalists from reporting on or publishing the proceedings of the Sohrabuddin Shaikh fake encounter case trial.

(Follow The Tribune on Facebook; and Twitter @thetribunechd)

Justice Revati Mohite-Dere minced no words in holding that the special CBI court overreached its powers in issuing the order.

She agreed with the petitioners -- a group of court reporters and city-based Union of Journalists -- that the Criminal Procedure Code provided only for the high courts and the apex court to issue such ban orders.

Such an order could be issued only in rare cases, and for a limited period of time, the court said.

Justice Mohite-Dere said mere apprehension of sensationalism by the accused was not a sufficient ground for issuing such gag orders.

On November 29 last year, the special CBI court had barred journalists from reporting or publishing the proceedings of the ongoing trial in the case.

The CBI court said while journalists can attend the proceedings, they must not make what transpired public.

Justice Mohite-Dere held that such a ban was unjustified and it breached a journalist's constitutional right of freedom of expression.

"The rights of the press are intrinsic with the constitutional right that guarantees freedom of expression. In reporting from an open trial, the press not only makes use of its own right, but serves the larger purpose of making such information available to the general public," she said.

She also dismissed the objections to such reportage by the accused persons in the case, saying they had failed to prove to the court that there existed any legal provision for a trial court to prohibit the press from reporting. — PTI 

COMMENTS

All readers are invited to post comments responsibly. Any messages with foul language or inciting hatred will be deleted. Comments with all capital letters will also be deleted. Readers are encouraged to flag the comments they feel are inappropriate.
The views expressed in the Comments section are of the individuals writing the post. The Tribune does not endorse or support the views in these posts in any manner.
Share On