SC notice to UP govt on petition against denial of sanction to prosecute CM : The Tribune India

Join Whatsapp Channel

Hate speech case

SC notice to UP govt on petition against denial of sanction to prosecute CM

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday asked the Uttar Pradesh government to respond to a petition challenging a February 2018 Allahabad High Court order accepting the state’s decision to decline sanction to prosecute Chief Minister Adityanath in an 11-year-old hate speech case.

SC notice to UP govt on petition against denial of sanction to prosecute CM

It was on Parvaz’s plea that a magistrate court in Gorakhpur had in 2008 ordered registration of a criminal case against Adityanath for alleged hate speech that caused riots. AFP file photo



Tribune News Service
New Delhi, August 20

The Supreme Court on Monday asked the Uttar Pradesh government to respond to a petition challenging a February 2018 Allahabad High Court order accepting the state’s decision to decline sanction to prosecute Chief Minister Adityanath in an 11-year-old hate speech case.

A three-judge Bench led by Chief justice of India Dipak Misra also issued notice to the Uttar Pradesh government’s home department, Gorakhpur District Magistrate and Superintendent of Police on the petition filed by Parwej Parvaz asking them to file their response in four weeks.

The Bench, also comprising Justice AM Khanwilkar and Justice DY Chandrachud, posted the matter for further hearing after six weeks.

It was on Parvaz’s plea that a magistrate court in Gorakhpur had in 2008 ordered registration of a criminal case against Adityanath for alleged hate speech that caused riots. Contending that the state police investigation was shoddy and unscientific, he demanded an impartial probe into the case against the chief minister.

The Uttar Pradesh Principal Home Secretary had in May 2017 opined that the draft probe report of the CBCID did not have sufficient evidence to prosecute Adityanath. Also, the Central Forensic Science Laboratory had concluded that the CD provided by the complainant against Adityanath and four others was tampered with, the official had said while declining sanction to prosecute those named in the complaint.

The petitioner contended that the decision was vitiated as the Home Department was under the chief minister who could not be a “judge in his own cause”. He alleged the video recording of the alleged speech was available on YouTube.

However, the high court found no discrepancy in the probe into the case and dismissed Parvaz’s petition against decision denying permission to prosecute Adityanath. The CD was never sent for forensic examination, he had contended before the high court. 

 

 

 

Top News

Supreme Court to pronounce order on Arvind Kejriwal's plea today, ED opposes interim bail

Supreme Court likely to pass orders on interim bail to Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal today

ED opposes it; asserts that the right to campaign in electio...

Pakistan, Russian connections detected in Ahmedabad school bomb threat case

Pakistan, Russian connections detected in Ahmedabad school bomb threat case

The threatening emails received a day before the May 7 Lok S...

India should respect Pak as it has atom bomb, says Congress veteran Mani Shankar Aiyar

BJP's Lok Sabha campaign 'faltering', dredging up old videos: Aiyar on Pakiatan's 'atom bomb' comments

In the video, Aiyar is saying that India should give respect...

Karnataka sex scandal: Twist in case as woman claims was forced to file false case

Karnataka sex scandal: Twist in case as woman claims was forced to file false case

Victims threatened with prostitution by SIT, claims Kumarasw...

Delhi Court to pass order on framing charges against Brij Bhushan Singh today

Delhi Court to pass order on framing charges against Brij Bhushan Singh today

Delhi Police in the chargesheet also submitted several pictu...


Cities

View All