Stalking case: Call records belie Varnika’s claims

CHANDIGARH:Records of calls made by Varnika Kundu, the complainant in a stalking case against Haryana BJP chief Subhash Barala’s son Vikas Barala, on the day of the incident have belied her original statement.

Stalking case: Call records belie Varnika’s claims

ROBINSINGH@TRIBUNE.COM

Ishrat S Banwait

Tribune News Service

Chandigarh, January 8

Records of calls made by Varnika Kundu, the complainant in a stalking case against Haryana BJP chief Subhash Barala’s son Vikas Barala, on the day of the incident have belied her original statement. 

As per her statement recorded in court, she had reached the inner market of Sector 8, Chandigarh, at 11.40 pm on August 4. However, her call records showed that she was in Chamkaur Sahib, Ropar, at 11.23 pm on the day.

Yet another contradiction came to the fore when she today stated that she was at her home in Panchkula before the incident and her driver dropped her in Sector 8. She stated this in response to a question posed by the defence counsel.

As per Varnika’s call records, her location is shown to be in Chamkaur Sahib of Ropar at 11.23 pm on August 4, which is over 50 km from Chandigarh. However, her location at 12.33 am is in Sector 26, Chandigarh. 

As per the call details, she was on call with her restaurateur friend in Manali, Anubhav Gurung, all this while. After the one hour, nine minute-call ended, she dialled ‘100’ and called Gurung again immediately after.

Defence counsel Rabindra Pandit also pointed out in the court that Varnika was revising her statements.

For the first time during the trial of the case, Varnika Kundu admitted that an advocate was present in the Sector 26 police station during the wee hours of August 5 when her complaint was being written. Varnika today admitted to the defence counsel that RC Takoria was also present in the police station while her complaint was being filed. However, Varnika also said Takoria was her paternal aunt’s husband and was present in the same capacity.

The defence counsel suggested to the court that Varnika was not present at the police station at the time, Varnika’s father Virender Kundu wrote the complaint and also forged her signatures at the end of it. 

The defence counsel told mediapersons that they would recommend that the CFSL tests the signature for its genuineness.  Varnika’s cross-examination will continue on Tuesday as well.

Top Stories

Jamnagar man found infected with Omicron variant of coronavirus after returning from Zimbabwe

Covid-19: India's 4th Omicron case detected in Maharashtra

33-year-old man from Kalyan Dombivli municipal area near Mum...

Samyukta Kisan Morcha meeting underway to decide future course of agitation

Farmers’ protest: SKM forms 5-member panel for talks with govt, wants written assurance on pending demands

Balbir Singh Rajewal, Ashok Dhawle, Shiv Kumar Kakka, Gurnam...

BJP in talks with Capt Amarinder, Sukhdev Dhindsa for alliance in Punjab: Amit Shah

BJP in talks with Capt Amarinder, Sukhdev Dhindsa for alliance in Punjab: Amit Shah

Assembly elections in Punjab and Uttar Pradesh will be held ...

Veteran journalist Vinod Dua dies at 67

Veteran journalist Vinod Dua dies at 67

Dua was a Hindi broadcast journalism pioneer with stints in ...

Mumbai-born Ajaz Patel third bowler in Test history to take perfect 10

'Perfect 10': Mumbai-born Ajaz Patel third bowler in Test history to take all 10 wickets in an innings

Equals the record of Jim Laker and Anil Kumble; cricketing f...

Cities

View All