SC reserves order on petition challenging Maharashtra CM’s election : The Tribune India

Join Whatsapp Channel

SC reserves order on petition challenging Maharashtra CM’s election

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday reserved its verdict on a petition seeking annulment of Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis’s election to the state assembly for allegedly failing to disclose certain criminal cases pending against him while filing the nomination papers.

SC reserves order on petition challenging Maharashtra CM’s election

Devendra Fadnavis. PTI file



Tribune News Service
New Delhi, July 23

The Supreme Court on Tuesday reserved its verdict on a petition seeking annulment of Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis’s election to the state assembly for allegedly failing to disclose certain criminal cases pending against him while filing the nomination papers.

A three-judge Bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi reserved the verdict after hearing detailed arguments from senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi for Fadnavis and senior counsel Vivek Tankha for petitioner Satish Ukey.

During the hearing, Rohatgi admitted that Fadanvis could not furnish details of two of the 25 cases pending against him but insisted that it didn’t amount to an electoral offence under Section 125A of the Representation of People Act  even as the Bench said the issue had to be decided during trial.

Ukey has challenged before the top court a Bombay High Court order dismissing his petition. The High Court had dismissed Ukey’s petition that had sought annulment of Fadnavis’s election to the Maharashtra Assembly for alleged non-disclosure of all pending criminal cases against him.

Ukey contended that the Chief Minister was required to disclose all pending cases against him under Section 33A (1) of the Representation of People’s Act.

He alleged that there were two cases pending in a Nagpur court. The non-disclosure of these two pending criminal cases amounted to violation of Section 125A of the RP Act and constituted an offence in itself, he contended.

In his election affidavit filed in 2014, Fadnavis had failed to disclose the pendency of two criminal cases against him. The two cases of alleged cheating and forgery were filed against Fadnavis in 1996 and 1998 but charges have not been framed.

The Supreme Court had on December 13 last year issued notice to Fadnavis on a petition challenging his election to the state assembly, alleging non-disclosure of criminal cases pending against him while filing his nomination papers.

Top News

Delhi Police register case in connection with doctored videos of Home Minister Amit Shah

Delhi Police register case in connection with doctored videos of Union Home Minister Amit Shah

The Special Cell has registered an FIR under various section...

Search operation to track down, neutralise terrorists under way in J-K's Udhampur

Search operation to track down, neutralise terrorists under way in J-K's Udhampur

A village Defence Guard was killed in a brief encounter with...

‘Sikh values are Canadian values’: PM Trudeau marks Khalsa day in Toronto amid pro-Khalistan chants

‘Sikh values are Canadian values’: PM Trudeau marks Khalsa day in Toronto amid pro-Khalistan chants

Canada PM emphasis on more flights to India, including to Am...

3 kids among 8 killed as goods vehicle collides with truck in Chhattisgarh

8 killed as goods vehicle collides with truck in Chhattisgarh

The victims, natives of Patharra village, were returning aft...

Missing 'Taarak Mehta' actor Gurucharan Singh was to get married, faced ‘financial distress’

Missing 'Taarak Mehta' actor Gurucharan Singh was to get married, faced ‘financial distress’

Singh, who went missing on April 22, left for Delhi's domest...


Cities

View All