Sunday, October 20, 2019
Opinion » This day, that year

Posted at: Mar 15, 2019, 7:41 AM; last updated: Mar 15, 2019, 7:41 AM (IST)

Mr Jinnah’s Speech


ONE of the strongest speeches on Mr Banerjea’s amendment was the speech of Mr Jinnah. It was delivered in reply to Mr Ironside’s speech, and it tore that speech in pieces. Mr Ironside said the Bill affected only a small and wicked section of the people and had expressed his surprise that the bigger and saner section of the public had taken up an attitude of hostility towards it. “He would ask Mr Ironside,” said Mr Jinnah in his reply, “to study the history of his own country. Mr Ironside’s countrymen had fought and shed their blood since the time of King John for the principle that no man’s liberty be taken away without trial. It was not the wicked that they wanted to protect, it was the innocent for whom they were pleading. If the government were determined to carry the measure through, all I would say was that I for one believed the consequences would be most unfortunate.” Mr Jinnah characterised Mr Ironside’s further remark that “concession to public opinion on this point would be a weakness” as a monstrous suggestion.


All readers are invited to post comments responsibly. Any messages with foul language or inciting hatred will be deleted. Comments with all capital letters will also be deleted. Readers are encouraged to flag the comments they feel are inappropriate.
The views expressed in the Comments section are of the individuals writing the post. The Tribune does not endorse or support the views in these posts in any manner.
Share On