AFSPA: Avoid polarisation : The Tribune India

AFSPA: Avoid polarisation

There is a way out of the two fiercely contested narratives about the Armed Forces Special Powers Act in Jammu and Kashmir.

AFSPA: Avoid polarisation

Members of the All-Party Hurriyat Conference shout slogans during a protest against the Army''s Pathribal verdict.



Arun Joshi

There  is a way out of the  two fiercely contested narratives  about the Armed Forces Special  Powers Act  in Jammu and Kashmir. The need of the hour is a fair and transparent assessment of the situation in which the ground realities and a  sense of mutual trust should matter the most, rather than  a perennial war scenario contrasted with the hate-mongering triggered by vested interests.

More importantly, a strong will  to find a way  forward  should be  on the agenda of both the sides. Unfortunately, the two sides  in this sensitive terrain  are identified  as  the people of Kashmir versus the Indian Army. The very purpose of the definition and objective of having the Army to protect the people is increasingly under threat. The twin narratives are massive misinformation about special powers of the armed forces under AFSPA which is opposed to the well-entrenched belief that no operation in Kashmir is possible without the shield of  AFSPA since it would undermine anti-militancy operations.

These two narratives are eroding the very idea  with which the Act was invoked  in  Jammu and Kashmir  in two phases — July 1990 and August 2001 — to protect the lives and properties of the people  against the onslaught of terrorism sponsored from across the border.

After almost 26 years of its existence, the  Disturbed Area Act  and AFSPA  do not have the relevance as when they were introduced  to combat militancy in July 1990. The people of the Valley  spent sleepless nights as peace was shattered by the  24x7 gunfire and grenade explosions. 

There is a reasonable validity in the Army's argument — though it should have been articulated  by the state and the Central government and  not by the generals — that this immunity is needed in some parts  of the state.  The Army did not come on its own, the governments  asked for them and their special powers in Jammu and Kashmir. In July 1990, the Centre  did it when the state was under Governor's rule and the late Mufti Mohammad Sayeed was the  Union Home Minister.

In the second phase, August 2001, it was enforced on the recommendations of the Farooq Abdullah government, which was under perceptible  pressure from the then NDA government at the Centre. The entire Jammu region was notified as “Disturbed Area”  and armed forces were conferred  with special powers. Earlier, only the Valley and 20-km radius from the Line of Control in the twin border districts of Rajouri and Poonch in Jammu region were covered under these provisions.

Now for more than a decade the debate has been raging whether the AFSPA should stay or go. The narrative is based mostly on the political, ideological and religious leanings,  rather than on a fair assessment of what is happening  on the ground and what needs to be done. The situation has changed, but contrasting  perceptions have not. It seems that the clock is either frozen for some or it is moving ahead of the times.   

The perception of the Kashmir-centric political groups of the the situation (partly  correct  too), is that it is much better than what it was in 1990 when AFSPA was invoked. Today, 20 out of 22 districts of the state are notified as Disturbed Areas and the armed forces enjoy immunity in these  parts of the state. It covers more than 95 per cent of the 12-million population of the state. A question was raised in  November 2011, what if the militants cover all the swathes  once the Army is  devoid of the special powers and finds it  difficult to  operate against them effectively  given the legal complexities  in conducting anti-terror operations. The  answer was typically political: “The  special powers can be restored  to the Army  once such an exigency arises.” 

Will any  Kashmir-centric party ever allow that to happen even if the militants happen to operate from their own neighbhourhood?  Never. Even if  they do it, the inevitable question is, why was the experiment  undertaken in the first place? Although  the street  protests  in 2016 have  a  disturbingly familiar resonance of the past, this time the Army is the prime target.   To counter such protests with guns  backfires. This strengthens the  anti-AFSPA narrative. A dispassionate  look at the prevailing situation in Jammu and Kashmir  is  a must before this debate to find a way forward is carried further. The narrative  based on the political, ideological and religious leanings  has to be shunned.

Need of the times — a way forward 

The threat perception should be  taken into account  by reflecting on the past, present and the future moves of the forces which are active from across the border. It should not be contrived but  based  purely on the strategic need. Involving elected representatives of  all the parties,  the independent-minded village elders on  a village-to-village basis  and the  men from the Army  in determining the threat and the remedy would offer a roadmap which is acceptable to all barring those who have a permanent anti-India and anti-Army agenda. 

The causes of the radicalisation  of the youth in  Kashmir should be analysed. It would  make an interesting study, whether the Army presence and  special powers are being used as a tool to further the agenda of the radicalisation.  If that is so, the psychological aspect should be given more weightage than any other option.

Alongside, a strategic endeavour would be to involve more and more people and the local religious leaders — there are many from outside the state who have  taken on themselves the task of  hardening the attitude of the younger generation  with hate-filled syllabi — to  curb radicalisation. 

The Jammu and Kashmir police should be given a role. Its recruitment should be  based on the professional  considerations and neither the political influence nor the religious leanings of the recruiting officials. Technology should be used extensively to eliminate the subjective human element in the recruitment process.

The Army should think of going back to the barracks  with dignity. It must strengthen its anti-infiltration grid beriending the villagers on the border. The AFSPA was a need  of the times goneby, it should be retained  in the areas close to the borders and in militancy-infested villages. 

The rest of the population and places should be allowed to live  in the  forces-free areas. Eventualities of the Army firing in retaliation to any attack anywhere in the state should be  considered because the soldiers should  never be allowed to be sitting ducks. All those demanding the recall of the AFSPA should ensure that the  Army operations  against terrorists are not  interrupted by the vicious propaganda that instigates protest  against the soldiers  and provides escape routes to militants. 

Mutual trust  should be at the core in each aspect of the assessment and the future security needs. The Army too should understand that no extraordinary law required for emergency situations can be  kept alive perpetually.

ajoshi57@gmail.com

Top News

Rahul Gandhi resumes final lap of Bharat Jodo Yatra from Srinagar’s Panthachowk

Rahul Gandhi resumes final lap of Bharat Jodo Yatra from Srinagar's Panthachowk

Congress leader will unfurl Tricolour at Lal Chowk City Cent...

On India tour, US diplomat Nuland to meet young techies

On India tour, US diplomat Nuland to meet young techies

Visit comes ahead of NSA chief’s US tour

Sarpanches’ protest: Former Haryana AAP president Naveen Jaihind taken in preventive custody

Sarpanches' protest: Former Haryana AAP president Naveen Jaihind taken into preventive custody

Sarpanches of Haryana to hold 'chakka jam' against Amit Shah...

Cocaine, charas seized at Gurugram nightclub

Cocaine, charas seized at Gurugram nightclub

288 detained, FIR filed

Gujarat head clerk exam cancelled after paper leak

Gujarat junior clerk exam cancelled after question paper leak; 1 suspect detained

9.5 lakh candidates had registered for the exam for 1,181 po...


Cities

View All