UP violence

Protect Lakhimpur Kheri witnesses, file separate report on lynching of 4 men: SC to UP

Protect Lakhimpur Kheri witnesses, file separate report on lynching of 4 men: SC to UP

The apex court has called for preparing a foolproof case. file

Satya Prakash

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, October 26

The Supreme Court today directed the UP Government to take measures to protect witnesses and get their statements recorded before magistrates in the Lakhimpur Kheri violence case.

‘Ask agencies to find more eyewitnesses’

  • On being informed that only 23 eyewitnesses have come forward so far, the Bench said “ask your agency to see there are more than 23 witnesses”
  • “Eyewitness evidence is more credible. It is always better to have first-hand evidence,” the Bench noted

The Bench also asked the UP Government to file a separate report on the second FIR about the lynching of four persons, including journalist Raman Kashyap, and posted the matter for further hearing on November 8.

Four farmers were allegedly mowed down by vehicles in the convoy of Ashish Mishra, son of Union minister Ajay Kumar Mishra.

A Bench led by Chief Justice NV Ramana issued the directions after senior counsel Harish Salve, representing the UP Government, said out of 68 witnesses, statements of only 20 had been recorded so far.

The Bench, which also included Justice Surya Kant and Justice Hima Kohli, perused the second status report filed by the SIT and directed the District Judge concerned to assign the task of recording statements under Section 164 of the CrPC to the nearest judicial magistrates available.

This is the second time that the top court has emphasised the need to record statements of witnesses before magistrates under Section 164 CrPC to prepare a foolproof case. “We get the impression that you are dragging your feet… Please do the needful to dispel that,” it had told the SIT on October 20.

As Salve said the SIT had issued an advertisement and only 23 persons, who were trying to see what happened, came forward, the Bench wondered how there could be just 23 persons in the rally.

“Ask your agency, see there are more than 23 (eye)witnesses. Eyewitness evidence is more credible. It is always better to have first-hand evidence,” the Bench noted.

“There was a crowd of 4,000-5,000 persons, who were all locals. Most of them were agitating even after the incident. This is what has been reported. All of them are serious witnesses. The identification of these people should not be a problem,” it said.

As the CJI said, identification was important, Salve said, “All 16 accused have been identified.”

Tribune Shorts


Top Stories

There is no UPA, Mamata Banerjee after meeting Sharad Pawar

There is no UPA, says Mamata Banerjee after meeting Sharad Pawar

Banerjee is on a three-day visit to Mumbai

International arrivals running smoothly; 1,013 passengers completed arrival formalities: Delhi airport

4 passengers from UK, Netherlands test positive for Covid, samples sent for genome sequencing

All four have been admitted to the LNJP Hospital, where a de...

Manjinder Singh Sirsa quits as DSGMC president

Manjinder Singh Sirsa quits as DSGMC president, joins BJP

The BJP tweeted a video of his joining the party

Mysuru on alert as 72 nursing students test positive for Covid

Mysuru on alert as 72 nursing students test positive for Covid

As many as 43 students of Kaveri Nursing hostel and 29 stude...

Cities

View All